Saturday, September 7, 2013
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
CAN WE FLY LITERACY FLAG ON INDEPENDENCE DAY?
CAN WE FLY LITERACY FLAG ON INDEPENDENCE DAY?
On August 15, we all shall fly our Tricolour and celebrate
once again that our country is a Sovereign, Secular Democratic Republic as
envisaged by our Freedom Fighters and makers of India. But somewhere, there is a
bit of ugly feeling that many of our fellow citizens are not having the basic Roti,
Kapada , Makan and, above all, ajeevika. We also have many people still
illiterate especially our women as today; the female
literacy levels according to the Literacy Rate
2011 census are 65.46% where the male literacy
rate is over 80%. The female literacy among the Scheduled tribes
in Odisha is 42.5%- much below the national average. . Despite having Total
Literacy Campaigns and many other kinds of efforts, the percentage of female literacy
has not significantly improved. In the entire country, the female literacy has needed
special attention and hence Saakshar Bharat Programme has been launched with a
lot of hope and positive visualisation. The Government and Civil Society Organisations
have been seriously engaged but can we set another example in the Country and
din the World that our female literacy rate is comparable to the developed
countries!
The National Literacy Mission has designed a
Literacy Flag and has formulate a pledge so that after hoisting the National
Flag, the Literacy Flag is hoisted in every Gram Panchayat and men and women
take the pledge. We all who are concerned with the issues of low female
literacy must hoist the Literacy Flag and take ledge to make all women literate
and send all the girls to school.
The Adult Literacy for the poor and the toiling mass have been visualised
by leading thinkers and practitioners
like great Mahatma Gandhi, Antonio Gramsci, Paulo Freire. They have demonstrated that the Empowerment
and Literacy go hand in hand resulting in the breaking the shackles of poverty
and marginalisation. On Independence
Day, we have to revisit the Pedagogy of the Oppressed and evolve suitable
strategies to combat illiteracy in the changing contexts of our society.
I am attaching the Literacy Flag and the Text
of the Pledge. Our friends will hopefully respond to my request of hoisting the
Flag and take the Pledge.
Saturday, August 3, 2013
TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD OR NOT TO KILL
TO KILL A MOCKING BIRD OR NOT TO KILL
"Mockingbirds don't do one thing but make music for us to
enjoy. They don't eat up people's gardens, don't nest in corncribs, they
don't do one thing but sing their hearts out for us. That's why it's a
sin to kill a mocking bird."(A Quote from the book by Harper Lee).
Like some of the best
books of the World, I had enjoyed reading To Kill a Mocking Bird by Harper Lee more
than 40 years back. A month ago , I saw the film made on the book in which Gregory Peck got an Oscar for best Actor
playing the role of Atticus, the lawyer and the father of the little girl Scout
who has narrated the book in her words.
Atticus, a white lawyer in White South of US was defending a black Tim Robinson
who was falsely implicated. The all white jury had given the verdict convicting
Tim who was unfair despite Atticus proving that Tim was innocent. Tim was
killed while escaping the prison. Atticus and his motherless children (Jem and Scout)
were the point of attack of the racist white. Finally, the law and the society
stood for him and his family. The Dignity was restored.
In United States of America and in the
entire World, this book was a best seller and so also the film was a great hit.
It had created tremendous sensation and
went into several editions. Harper Lee, the Pulitzer Award Winning author of
the book had indicated that the novel had been autobiographical to some
extent. However whether there
been was any dent on the discrimination in terms of the class and colour, race
and religion, is a big question. Recent legal debate on the killing of black boy
Trayvon Martin in US and suicide/murder on Dalit youth Illavarasan
in Tamil Nadu do indicate that the society has hardly changed.
For a few nights, I
could not sleep after seeing the film as I thought more and more of our society
which has been rife with discrimination and hatred. One who stands for the poor
and marginalised, is insulted and humiliated. One who stands for the rights of
the underprivileged gets implicated. However, we all have to fight the ravages
of the Society collectively and like Atticus should firmly believe that the
mocking birds are not to be killed. Never.
Thursday, July 25, 2013
Implementation of Right to Information Act - More Intensive Collaborative Efforts Required
I was happy to participate in the Inaugural Session of the State Level
RTI Convention held at Rourkela on 24th September. It has been organised
by the Odisha Soochana Adhikar Abhiyan ( Rourkela Chapter ) . The Chief
Speaker was Mrs. Aruna Roy. I shared the Podium with Mr. Sahdev Sahoo (
ex-Chief Secretary ) and Mr. Gopal Nanda ( ex-DGP), Dr. Akshay Samal
and Mr. Pradeep Pradhan. It was a great feeling to share some thoughts
with the RTI Activists. It was an impressive show by the organisers.
Thanks to the activists in and around Rourkela.
It is heartening to see that so many RTI Activiists are there to take forward the implementation of the RTI Act and share a collective vision envisaged by Mrs. Aruna Roy and her colleagues in the RTI Movement. There are many challenges but they have to be overcome. Mrs. Aruna Roy gave a call to work om one or two cross cutting issues in which all the activists across the country will be involved. We all agree that to sustain the Democracy in its true form in this country, one of the most non-violent and powerful tools have been the RTI Act.We all have to use it. We all have to defend that attack on the Act and those whistle-blowers who have been using the Act for a cause.
In my address I also suggested strategies which could make the whole process more broad-based. One thing which has not drawn much attention so far is the Section 4(1) (a), (b) of the RTI Act indicating Suo Motto and Proactive disclosure by the Public Authorities. All the activists are working like WHISTLE-BLOWERS and are in a confrontation mood with the administration. It is inevitable that barring a few in the administration, most of the authorities stonewall the process of providing information. The activists have to run from pillars to posts to seek and get quality information. They run to the Information Commission but perhaps do not get an immediate hearing. In Kashipur, ordinary people file RTI Applications and they have to run 20 times from far away places to the Government Offices and get frustrated. The Officials also often mock these Information Seekers. Thus, Confrontation becomes inevitable. This approach is valid to some extent but will not take the RTI Activists very far.
Under Suo Motto Disclosure, the Public Authorities are bound to share information in public domain. A close look at section 4(1) and the provisions indicate that information has to be shared at all levels. The ordinary citizens must be given all the required and relevant information by these Public Authorities about numerous Schemes and Programmes, Acts and Policies, and the proposed Acts and Policies. The sharing information in the Internet is not enough. It should be available to the people at door step. The RI Act should not be confined to the Civil Societies but to one and all including the Government, Corporate, NGOs , Media and Political Parties etc. who are termed as Public Authorities. This requires a Collaborative Framework and an act of moral persuasion notwithstanding the legal provisions. We the Civil Society Activists have to have greater interface with the Public Authorities so that there would be more sharing of information.
We do need the support of retired Govt. officials in the RTI Fora but we also need the serving officers. Imagine the impact, if in the inaugural function, the current Chief Secretary and the DGP are sharing the Podium and are addressing the RTI Activists. That would have made much more sense and would have given the right kind of message.
To make the RTI movement in Odisha a success , to my mind, both the strategies - Confrontation and Collaboration - have to be institutionalised. I am sure Odisha Soochana Adhikar Abhiyan will take note of my suggestions.
It is heartening to see that so many RTI Activiists are there to take forward the implementation of the RTI Act and share a collective vision envisaged by Mrs. Aruna Roy and her colleagues in the RTI Movement. There are many challenges but they have to be overcome. Mrs. Aruna Roy gave a call to work om one or two cross cutting issues in which all the activists across the country will be involved. We all agree that to sustain the Democracy in its true form in this country, one of the most non-violent and powerful tools have been the RTI Act.We all have to use it. We all have to defend that attack on the Act and those whistle-blowers who have been using the Act for a cause.
In my address I also suggested strategies which could make the whole process more broad-based. One thing which has not drawn much attention so far is the Section 4(1) (a), (b) of the RTI Act indicating Suo Motto and Proactive disclosure by the Public Authorities. All the activists are working like WHISTLE-BLOWERS and are in a confrontation mood with the administration. It is inevitable that barring a few in the administration, most of the authorities stonewall the process of providing information. The activists have to run from pillars to posts to seek and get quality information. They run to the Information Commission but perhaps do not get an immediate hearing. In Kashipur, ordinary people file RTI Applications and they have to run 20 times from far away places to the Government Offices and get frustrated. The Officials also often mock these Information Seekers. Thus, Confrontation becomes inevitable. This approach is valid to some extent but will not take the RTI Activists very far.
Under Suo Motto Disclosure, the Public Authorities are bound to share information in public domain. A close look at section 4(1) and the provisions indicate that information has to be shared at all levels. The ordinary citizens must be given all the required and relevant information by these Public Authorities about numerous Schemes and Programmes, Acts and Policies, and the proposed Acts and Policies. The sharing information in the Internet is not enough. It should be available to the people at door step. The RI Act should not be confined to the Civil Societies but to one and all including the Government, Corporate, NGOs , Media and Political Parties etc. who are termed as Public Authorities. This requires a Collaborative Framework and an act of moral persuasion notwithstanding the legal provisions. We the Civil Society Activists have to have greater interface with the Public Authorities so that there would be more sharing of information.
We do need the support of retired Govt. officials in the RTI Fora but we also need the serving officers. Imagine the impact, if in the inaugural function, the current Chief Secretary and the DGP are sharing the Podium and are addressing the RTI Activists. That would have made much more sense and would have given the right kind of message.
To make the RTI movement in Odisha a success , to my mind, both the strategies - Confrontation and Collaboration - have to be institutionalised. I am sure Odisha Soochana Adhikar Abhiyan will take note of my suggestions.
Saturday, July 20, 2013
LETS SHED THIS HYPOCRISY
The
recent tragic deaths of 25 children in Chhapra, Bihar due to the
insecticide poisoning of the mid-day meal and also food-poisoning of
mid-day meal at several places in the country have raised many
questions on MDM- management, quantity and quality, appropriateness of
cooked food and overall approach to Nutrition Security of our children.
We provide food to our children in Mukta Gyana Kutir but with a difference. We do not provide cheap food. We ensure quality and quantity, taste and timing, the joy of giving and sharing. During summer, the children have ragi porridge in the morning as the morning classes start followed by a lunch. The children get some seasonal vegetables/spinach every Saturday to add to the MDM. The children have a plot in the campus to grow their vegetables to make curries. The teachers are joining the children for food. The School Management Committee consisting of parents discuss the MDM in their meetings appreciate that their children are always looking healthy and happy.
The MDM and its management is a collective responsibility and can not be simply the responsibilities of the teachers and the Government. If there is so much discussion on fighting malnutrition among the children, why can't there be adequate provisions to ensure quality and quantity? Why it will be cheap? Why there will be scams in MDM? Why there will be insecticides in the MDM? All these are indicative that we do not love our children though we advertise that they are the future of our Country. Utter Hypocrisy!
We provide food to our children in Mukta Gyana Kutir but with a difference. We do not provide cheap food. We ensure quality and quantity, taste and timing, the joy of giving and sharing. During summer, the children have ragi porridge in the morning as the morning classes start followed by a lunch. The children get some seasonal vegetables/spinach every Saturday to add to the MDM. The children have a plot in the campus to grow their vegetables to make curries. The teachers are joining the children for food. The School Management Committee consisting of parents discuss the MDM in their meetings appreciate that their children are always looking healthy and happy.
The MDM and its management is a collective responsibility and can not be simply the responsibilities of the teachers and the Government. If there is so much discussion on fighting malnutrition among the children, why can't there be adequate provisions to ensure quality and quantity? Why it will be cheap? Why there will be scams in MDM? Why there will be insecticides in the MDM? All these are indicative that we do not love our children though we advertise that they are the future of our Country. Utter Hypocrisy!
Saturday, July 6, 2013
Mrs. Tulsi Munda gets Doctorate and Mrs. Sumani Jhodia faces Non-bailable Warrant: Two Manifestations of Tribal Development
We all congratulate
Mrs. Tulsi Munda , the well-known tribal woman leader of Odisha for getting an
Honorary Doctorate from the Central
University, Koraput. She
has been recipient of many awards including Padmashree. She is one of the most well-known face of the tribals in
Odisha and has been on the podium of many events organised by the Government,
Corporate and the Civil Societies. She is the symbol of the crowning glory that
an humble tribal can achieve. She has also become the spokesperson of the
tribals on many an occasion expressing views on mining and industrialisation,
displacement and development, identity and culture and many more. The
Government has always sought her opinion in many issues. The ruling power elite
have always wanted to put her on the pedestal and have made her iconic. But her
critics have questioned her when she has kept mum over many sensitive issues
affecting tribal lives and livelihoods. Questions have been raised when she
gives an impression of being co-opted by the establishment. Eyebrows have been
raised when the entire corporate sectors support her organisation with
financial grants, vehicles, buildings, manpower and other infra-structural
support. Whatever it may be she has to
be praised for her ability to rise to the occasion and be a leader of her
community. Surely, there will be many laurels coming in Mrs. Tulsi Munda’s way in future. It is
already written on the wall.
Mrs. Sumani Jhodia
came to the lime light when late Chief Minister Biju Patnaik had appointed her
as one of her Advisers in early 90s recognising her articulation and her
profile of courage. Coming from a modest Paraja Community she was in the
forefront of many struggles and movements
fighting for her rights, entitlements and justice. Once she was given
the Police Power by the Government to stop liquor business and she broke many
liquor shops with the help of tribal women of her area. She had taken up a
range of issues in support of the tribals for rights over land, minor forest
produce, tribal self-rule, right to information and for development with
dignity for her community. Once late Biju Patnaik offered her a vehicle and she
refused politely saying that an ambulance should come to her local hospital.
She got prestigious Stree Shakti Award from the Government which she used for
the development of her community. In the Tribes Advisory Council she had opposed
the transfer of Tribal
Land and collided with
the power that be resulting in the loss
of her membership. She refused an Award by Nalco protesting the Maikanch Police firing in Dec 2000 killing three
innocent tribes. Due to the conspiracy by the promoters of industry, Jhodias have lost the tribal status though they are
Parajas. Mrs. Suman Jhodia is running from pillar to post to get back her
tribal status and secure justice. At the moment she is on bail from the High Court
as she has been implicated in
non-bailable cases. Two cases are related to anti-liquor campaign. The third
case is where she led a group of people to Block Office to demand better implementation
of various development programmes of the Government. She is a symbolic
resistance to the attack on all the tribals of this country.
The Tribals to day are at a cross-road – whether to
follow the foot steps of Mrs. Tulsi
Munda or Mrs. Sumani Jhodia. The choice is absolutely theirs.

Saturday, June 29, 2013
Amma Canteen: Tamil Nadu Shows the Way
Amma Canteen: Tamil Nadu shows the Way
Achyut
Das
During my recent visit to Chennai, I had the opportunity to
visit an outlet of Amma Canteen launched by the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Mrs.
Jayalalitha. I had read a lot about this historic effort and also had visited
the websites to know more about that. I was excited that the Government is
promoting these Low Cost Canteens to sell Idlis @ Re1/- per one, Curd Rice @
Rs.3/- per plate, Sambhar Rice @ Rs.5 and Pongal Rice @Rs.5/- per plate. Anyone can have the
breakfast and lunch which will cost Rs.18/- per person (5 Idlis for breakfast,
Pongal and Curd Rice for Lunch). The Amma Canteen is planning in a big way to
supply Chappattis too. In these canteens, any one can eat but can not take away
outside. There are already 200 such canteen set up in all 200 wards of the City
and are being expanded to many cities of
Tamil Nadu. Amazing!
I visited one of the Canteens early in the morning when the
things are under preparation. One unit is managed by an SHG Group of 12 women
and all are trained. Each one gets a salary of
Rs, 9000/- per month. Job chart is there for each one – cleaning,
cutting the vegetables, cooking, and serving. There is fixed time for breakfast
and fixed time for lunch. Idli mix has to be prepared one day before so that it
is properly fermented. Each Canteen is designed with a lot of imagination to
have place for cooking, store, dining space, and with proper water supply and
electricity. Place is absolutely neat and clean. Huge cooking vessels are
supplied. There is a water filter for every one to get pure water to drink
after the meal. Women are wearing caps. Which is required while doing the work? The provisions are centrally provided. One
supervisor looks after the supply, accounts and over all management. There is
quality control. This Canteen I visited is serving 5000 persons on average who
are mostly labourers, auto-drivers, Masons, students, working class women etc.
No hassles whatsoever.
I was trying to communicate with the women asking them a
range of questions on their background, their training, salary, attitude and
aptitude towards their work, drudgery of doing the same thing again and again
and also the economics part. The women are happy that they are feeding 5000
people in two shifts. An air of affirmation is visible on their profile.
Is the Amma Canteen a correct approach to remove hunger and
starvation? Is it confined to urban and peri-urban pockets catering to the need
of the labourers pouring into the cities from the villages in search of
livelihood? How much is subsidised? How long this kind of Public Sector
ventures will survive? Is it the only alternative that the rations
are supplied centrally?
I strongly feel that to combat starvation, hunger and
malnutrition etc., such kind of Amma Canteens could be one of the strategies
which the state can adopt. It is not free-food. It is affordable. It is part of
the culture and not imported from outside or foreign countries like CARE feeding
or Danish Biscuits or WFP food supplements. Tamil Nadu had the distinction of
introducing Mid-day Meal in 80s under the leadership of the then CM late Mr. MG
Ramachandran and the whole country adopted it.
Some critics of Amma canteen are asking about economics of
the whole thing and unsustainability part of it. I think this is the best use
of the subsidised rice and other food grains.
This could be another innovative way of ensuring Food Security for All.
I think of Odisha where such canteens should be started in the high risk villages
and Panchayats known for hunger and starvation deaths. Odisha is drowned with
the ignominy of Jhintu Bariha’s
starvation death. A time has come to do
something so that the state does not allow any one to have starvation death. At
least one such canteen is opened in every Block Headquarters of all KBK
Districts to start with. I know there will be several questions like where is
the infra-structure, assured electricity, water supply, trained women from the
SHGs, supply line, quality control etc.. But if there is a political will, it
can be arranged.
We may not have Idlis
and Pongal rice , but we can have Khichdi, Shattu, Murhi with curry, even rice
and dal easily cooked and sold. It can be delicacies from the local millets
which the tribal love. Odisha has a history of subsidising the corporate in
thousands of crores. Why can’t it subsidise food for the hungry?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

